This is a read-only archive of the old Madabout Kitcars forum. New posts and replies are no longer possible, but every thread is still here to browse and read.
I have had similar ideas of retaining the Z3 gauge pod and forming a "cover" dash
Yep, I think that approach will work a treat. I'll be interested to see what moulding you come up with - I really like the idea of an upholstered 'eyebrow' type dash top with a painted 'metal' panel to take the instruments and switches. If you don't make one Chris I sure will.
The dash on my Spyder sets it apart from most of its kind -
It was a moulding taken from a Porsche 550 Spyder that Gary Janes just happened to have laying around in his workshop. I was going to make something myself, but Gary sold me the 550 dash and I adapted it to fit the Sammio body.
To me, the dash is one of the most important aspects of a replica/kit car/Tribute, as together with the steering wheel, seats and gear-lever it's one of the primary interfaces you have with the car. After all, when you're driving a car you spend more time looking at the dash than anything else.
Not sure if you can tell, but I'm really excited about this project.
Just read back through the Kobra thread and found this image -
I take it you took a moulding from that prototype dash? Bit of work to give it the slightly raised 'pod' to take the Z3 gauges and that'd do nicely.
Also came across this picture -
Anyone know if the fillet panel that runs from the back of the transmission tunnel to half way up the rear bulkhead is structural? (the triangular bit with an oblong hole that looks like a holder for an i-phone on its front face).
I'd be tempted to take the angle grinder to it if it isn't.
Yep, I'd box it in if it's structural, but if it isn't I'd rather cut it out and leave a flat bulkhead. It's funny how details like that matter, but to me they just do...
It looks structural to me. I think it would be classed as stiffening. I think you have to be very carful taking an angle grinder to anything on these shells. Else you may find the car requiring an IVA with all the nit picking and expense that involves.
I don't know if these base units are classed as a chassis, a floor pan or a body shell, VOSA/DVLA have some pretty strict guidelines/rules regarding what you can and can't do without the need for an IVA.
ACE have a page which covers this and contains some guidance, but interpretation is key, our interpretation may differ from that of VOSA/DVLA. There are cases where non structural parts have to remain, especially with body shells, sometimes even drilling a panel or re-shaping it can be classed as a modification, in some cases it can call into question it's integrity. In VOSA/DVLA's eyes altering a panel destroys it's originality and therefore it is modified. A bugger I know but those appear to be the rules. Here is a link to an ACE guidance page of their website. I suspect the BMW Z3 is likely viewed as a body shell or floorpan structure and almost every panel has to remain as it came out of the factory. There are other pages on the ACE website which are helpful in this regard.
Don't get me wrong, I am NOT anti modification but as one who has been bitten hard by the system I am very cautious, I try to help anybody avoid the disaster of spending a great deal of time and money building a car which is then deemed to need re-registering and therefor needing an IVA. That is the whole point of using the Z3 as a base, so one needs to be very carful not to bastardise it. To get the ultimate result it can become a bit of a tightrope walk, just don't fall off.
Thanks for the feedback guys, you're absolutely right about not messing with anything structural - it just looks like a carrier for the plastic trim to me though and I'd love to get rid of it.
Guess I'll have to wander into my local Beemer dealer and ask the man in the oily overalls with a hand-rolled fag hanging out the corner of his mouth for a definitive answer...
These things suffer from broken spot welds and iffy diff mounting as standard so do you really want to chopping out a strengthening panel?
I know they were built Stateside, but are they really that bad?
Anyone know if the diff issue is linked to the power output of the engine - are the bigger motors overpowered? If so, all the more reason to stick with a 1.9.
Looks like the monocoque was only ever meant to take a lightweight 140hp motor and anything bigger can stress the structure to the point of catastrophic failure.
But hey, at least you can boast to the other patients in A&E that your car was going 150mph when the back wheels came off...
From what I have read on the forums it was only really the Z3Ms that ripped their own arses off
I read that only z3ms are affected too. The extra 100 odd horse power and traditional LSD will do that! (The Torsen diff in the 2.8 seems less harsh in action to me compared with the clutch type used in M cars)
Anyone with a Z3 should change the diff oil occasionally. BMW called it lifetime oil but it isn't. I changed mine in about 15 minutes and it came out like drinking chocolate. A lot smoother and quieter since the new oil went in.
Instructions
The diff has 2 plugs at the back. Remove the spare of you have one to see them more easily.
Loosen the top one slightly to make sure you can. You don't want to drain the diff and find you can't undo the fill plug.
Remove the lower plug and let the oil drain fully.
Put the bottom plug back in and remove the top plug.
With the car level, fill the diff until it just starts to dribble out.
Refit the top plug and drive away happy
Anyone with a Z3 should change the diff oil occasionally. BMW called it lifetime oil but it isn't. I changed mine in about 15 minutes and it came out like drinking chocolate. A lot smoother and quieter since the new oil went in.
That's good advice. As much as I like drinking chocolate it isn't a good lubricant
Wow, it gets better every time I see it and looks like a top quality kit with some well thought out details. Well done guys!
I have spotted a few things that are making me rethink my quick and simple build plans though. Thats not necessarily a bad thing, just requires a different picture in my head.
I have spotted a few things that are making me rethink my quick and simple build plans though. Thats not necessarily a bad thing, just requires a different picture in my head.
Tell us Gaz.
Tell us of these things you have spotted of which you speak, and of the picture you have in your head.