Skip to main content

MadaboutKitcars

This is a read-only archive of the old Madabout Kitcars forum. New posts and replies are no longer possible, but every thread is still here to browse and read.

Is that a DNA kit oh dear

1 Jun 2020, 8:44pm
worth a watch that video it would make a good film .cheers paul
1 Jun 2020, 10:36pm
It's always been misuse of trade dress I.e. badging as far as I'm aware. Some names also copyright of F. I found a website once which shows all copyrights held. Jumping of F as starting point was like going down rabbit hole. Current and recent body shapes were on there as well. And the name Scaglietti. No vintage cars however. They have loads of copyrights.

Nubodi - used trade dress in commercial adverts (and biggest wing shields known to man) - jumped on. DNA - used trade dress in commercial adverts and prominently displayed at classic car shows - jumped on. GB used trade dress - jumped on (alledged).

Mirage GT - far more accurate SWB evocation than Tribute - never strayed into trade dress infringement - trading happily.

Have to remember you're dabbling in blue chip investment territory which is probably why, I'm surmising, activity is focused here rather than the MR2 based modern style offerings. It's like the family silver... which is why I had my car debadged pronto after buying.
2 Jun 2020, 6:15am
How dare you...

Caterham invoked this when 'their' design was plagiarised.

It's a jungle.

Regards, Mick
4 Jun 2020, 1:28pm
Mick O'Malley wrote:
Caterham invoked this when 'their' design was plagiarised.

It's a jungle.

Regards, Mick


The 7's that emerged after were all similar but very slightly different. Must have been different enough in the eyes of the rule makers to be deemed ok.
Not sure what happened with the Cobra replica scene as I think Shelby tried the same thing but failed.
4 Jun 2020, 7:20pm
Lucky@LeMans wrote:
Not sure what happened with the Cobra replica scene as I think Shelby tried the same thing but failed.


See my Post #26 above, the video is all about that.

Cheers, Paul. :)
11 Jul 2020, 3:13pm
Paul L wrote:
It is a bit of a long story and based on American law, but this is a great insight into this sort of thing.

Key points seemed to be you have to defend the trade mark and some parts of a car are technical and not covered (e.g. flared wheel arches).

https://www.facebook.com/factoryfive/videos/1885675164897704/?t=1


That was really interesting. Especially the Crossley part with the Co-bra name.
Thanks for posting.
11 Jul 2020, 5:18pm
I saw (on MSN news if we can believe it) that Ferrari have lost a case for retaining their rights to the 250 GTO 'shape' as they haven't produced a vehicle - It seems they can produce scale models, as they have been actively selling them! All still looks a bit questionable IMHO.