Skip to main content

MadaboutKitcars

This is a read-only archive of the old Madabout Kitcars forum. New posts and replies are no longer possible, but every thread is still here to browse and read.

Sammio Spyder For Sale

29 May 2018, 8:58pm
Dark blue really suits them ...
29 May 2018, 9:02pm
oxford1360 wrote:
The rear outriggers...surely an MOT tester might consider them dangerous. But at least they look really good...


Its exempt as of 2 days ago anyway ..but agreed , its a strange thing to leave them like that ..
29 May 2018, 9:19pm
lancelot link wrote:
Its exempt as of 2 days ago anyway ..but agreed , its a strange thing to leave them like that ..


I thought it could only be declared exempt if not 'substantially changed' in the last 30 years.
30 May 2018, 6:37am
peterux wrote:
I thought it could only be declared exempt if not 'substantially changed' in the last 30 years.


Yep, needs declaring as a radically altered vehicle and won't be MOT exempt. Car has good and bad points -

Good = nice registration number, good colour, will still be tax exempt and has some nice detailing.

Bad = unsuitable seats, nasty rear spats, rear chassis protrusion (maybe left on for the old DVLA inspection?) and that luggage rack would have to go (they just don't look right on a 'racing' car to me).

Overall I'd say that the bad points are all relatively easy to put right, and it could be a cheap way for someone to end up with a nicely finished car.

The real sticking point for a new owner could be the re-reg process though. I'd want to see a file of photographs of the car before and during the build plus a signed declaration detailing the alterations made from the builder included in the sale.

Watching with interest.
30 May 2018, 7:20am
Mister Towed wrote:


The real sticking point for a new owner could be the re-reg process though. I'd want to see a file of photographs of the car before and during the build plus a signed declaration detailing the alterations made from the builder included in the sale.

Watching with interest.


DVLA will only require one photo of car before , one picture of car after , both preferably three quarter views showing the number plate but not compulsory ..a receipt for the new bodyshell and a declaration by the current owner stating that it is a re-body . There is a section on the form for you to declare a third party built the car ...currently no inspections on re-bodies are being carried out so its a good time to change the details ...

I don't understand why the builder hasn't done it though ..its easy , free and in our current climate of V5c issues , new regs etc. having not done it will put a lot of people off ...
30 May 2018, 8:40am
micky1mo wrote:
It's based on a 13/60 Triumph Herald and the motor looks standard.
The way I'v understood it 13/60 is 13 =1300cc and 60 = 60BHP.
It's old brother was the 12/50, 12=1200cc and 50 =50BHP.

I could be wrong! :yawn:


your right, I was looking at spitfire specs my sam been a spit base!
30 May 2018, 11:57am
peterux wrote:
I thought it could only be declared exempt if not 'substantially changed' in the last 30 years.


I think that depends on whether the outriggers on the Herald are defined as part of the chassis.

The MOT exemption declaration form is here:
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/707632/v112-declaration-of-exemption-from-mot.pdf

And the components covered do not include the body shell.

My car has the Spitfire chassis, which is different to the Herald, so I expect to become VHI when my car qualifies in 2021. :pray:

Cheers, Paul. :)