It also was most interesting that it put forward compulsory additional control and monitoring systems. It actually states that they could demand that further control be retrofitted to existing cars. This could include further vehicle 'stability' or for example computer controlled anti-lock or skid systems to a 1960-70's vehicle. A ridiculously stupid idea to integrate these systems into an old system as both the hardware to do this and the likelihood of software errors would make the vehicle far less safe. Do they not realise the dangers of this and the need for permanent software upgrades as parts or even tolerances change. This is not stupid, its dangerous!
|
Threaded Mode
