Are you madabout kit cars      
 "We've Got Kit Cars Covered" Information about Madabout-Kitcars.com Contact Madabout-Kitcars.com         Home of UK kit cars - madabout-kitcars.com Various kit car write ups All the latest kit car news Kit car related and general discussion

Search
Manufacturers
Kit Cars
Kit Car Data sheets
Picture Gallery
SVA Knowledgebase
Clubs & Communities
Build cost estimator
Kit cars for sale
Knowledge Base 
KitcarUSA.com
Classic-Kitcars.com
 

Go Back   Madabout Kitcars Forum > Mad Build Area > Marlin Sportster, Cabrio, Berlinetta and Roadster builds

Marlin Sportster, Cabrio, Berlinetta and Roadster builds Enthused or Confused about your vintage Marlin build? Ask away here or show off your build.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 18th January 2012, 10:32
Mike Mike is offline
Senior Member
Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 932
Mike is on a distinguished road
Default

Hi to BMW m/c users

John believes he can supply these at £53.00 +VAT = £63.60 +p&p. (I think this will be without the reservoir - but a standard original Sierra reservoir cleans up very well if required).

Has anyone found a lower cost source?

I thought I only paid around £40 for mine, but as I gave up saving invoices (due to the frigtening total cost of my car) I can not be sure.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike View Post
The master cylinder I have looks like this one:


Reply With Quote
Available from eBay
  #2  
Old 18th January 2012, 12:36
Mike Mike is offline
Senior Member
Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 932
Mike is on a distinguished road
Default

Hi all

I have found my original invoice for my master cylinder, and I bought it off ebay!

Mine was for a Sierra, and does have a 22.2mm bore. However, these are becoming very difficult to source. The ebay seller has Cotina Mk4/5 which could just as easily be used with our adaptor plate.
I have checked with the seller, the projection towards the servo for the Cortina one is only 15mm, and has a diameter of 39mm, so is ideal. Even better for the BMW set up, is the fact that it has a 20.6mm bore, (which I believe one of you said was closer yto the original BMW?)



http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/FORD-CORTI...item20c15fe003

And best of all they are less than £40 - while stocks last!!!!!!!!!!

Hopefully this has solved the last of your major problems - the rest are normal kit car problems!

Regards
Mike

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike View Post
Hi to BMW m/c users

John believes he can supply these at £53.00 +VAT = £63.60 +p&p. (I think this will be without the reservoir - but a standard original Sierra reservoir cleans up very well if required).

Has anyone found a lower cost source?

I thought I only paid around £40 for mine, but as I gave up saving invoices (due to the frigtening total cost of my car) I can not be sure.

Last edited by Mike; 18th January 2012 at 12:38.. Reason: Changed Escort detail to Cortina detail
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 20th January 2012, 07:26
MartinClan's Avatar
MartinClan MartinClan is offline
Senior Member
Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,895
MartinClan is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike View Post
.
I have checked with the seller, the projection towards the servo for the Cortina one is only 15mm, and has a diameter of 39mm, so is ideal. Even better for the BMW set up, is the fact that it has a 20.6mm bore, (which I believe one of you said was closer yto the original BMW?)
Mike
Has anyone have any experience of using the Cortina M/C? While it has exactly the correct bore, I wonder if the holes through which the fluid enters are of the correct size to accept the little fitting from Marlin for the remote reservoir? (As I am currently using with the BMW M/C.)

If not it may be a safer bet to go for the Sierra one which has already been used several times?

Cheers

Robin
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 20th January 2012, 07:53
Mike Mike is offline
Senior Member
Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 932
Mike is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MartinClan View Post
Has anyone have any experience of using the Cortina M/C? While it has exactly the correct bore, I wonder if the holes through which the fluid enters are of the correct size to accept the little fitting from Marlin for the remote reservoir? (As I am currently using with the BMW M/C.)

If not it may be a safer bet to go for the Sierra one which has already been used several times?

Cheers

Robin

Pick up the phone and ask the seller!

The ebay sellers details are all available through his ebay site
Malcom Harrison
Tel 01603 880217

I would be reasonably sure they will fit, as the Metro rubber seals fit the Ford m/c


As well as Cortinas Mk4/5 he has Escort RS2000 with 20.6mm bore. There are Capri m/c as well, so there will be enough for all.

He will measure the hole diameters and centres.
He is not able to source Sierra m/cs. One of the 7 lookalike companies bought all the remaining stock!

PS - If anyone wants to go remote, I have a pair of elbows at a very reasonable price! But try Marlin first........!!!!!!!

Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 20th January 2012, 12:39
peterux's Avatar
peterux peterux is offline
Senior Member
Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,079
peterux is on a distinguished road
Default Bingo!

I think I have solved the puzzle of the 'Ford' Master cylinder part number.

After double checking and then realising my BMW master cylinder is actually a dual diameter bore size, I decided to go for a 22mm cylinder.

Based on a hunch that the Marlin supplied M/C it was off a Ford Sierra and Mike's info that it is a Bendix OE, I ordered a BMC4052 from Brakes International.
It arrived today and has the magic numbers 383059 on the side.
It's just like Jason's but with the outlets on the engine side.
It is manufactured by an Italian firm called Cifam. (www.cifam.it)
The logo on the M/c is Ci. It is Cifam part number 202-099.
The Cifam website and catalogue has lots of useful info with pictures, 'where else used' and other suppliers equivalent part numbers.
It is brand new in a sealed box and was delivered to my door about 42 hours after I placed the order!
Manufacturers packing date is 08/07/11 so nice fresh stock.
Total price was £57.96 inc. VAT and courier delivery.

Thanks to Robin for finding www.brakesint.co.uk

I'll be checking all the relevant measurements and post some pictures over the weekend.

...peter

PLEASE READ POST #525 below before ordering this M/C. THIS PART NUMBER MAY ONLY BE SUITABLE FOR CARS WITH DRUMS AT THE BACK

Last edited by peterux; 13th February 2012 at 20:10.. Reason: additional warning added
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 20th January 2012, 13:37
mashtun mashtun is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Livingston, West Lothian
Posts: 74
mashtun is on a distinguished road
Default

Aha! So that logo on the side of mine is Ci! Well spotted, Peter

Mine is exactly the same model, sourced 18 months ago from the ebay seller Mike linked to up-thread.

Mark.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 20th January 2012, 15:51
Mike Mike is offline
Senior Member
Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 932
Mike is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by peterux View Post
I think I have solved the puzzle of the 'Ford' Master cylinder part number.

After double checking and then realising my BMW master cylinder is actually a dual diameter bore size, I decided to go for a 22mm cylinder.

Based on a hunch that the Marlin supplied M/C it was off a Ford Sierra and Mike's info that it is a Bendix OE, I ordered a BMC4052 from Brakes International.
It arrived today and has the magic numbers 383059 on the side.
It's just like Jason's but with the outlets on the engine side.
It is manufactured by an Italian firm called Cifam. (www.cifam.it)
The logo on the M/c is Ci. It is Cifam part number 202-099.
The Cifam website and catalogue has lots of useful info with pictures, 'where else used' and other suppliers equivalent part numbers.
It is brand new in a sealed box and was delivered to my door about 42 hours after I placed the order!
Manufacturers packing date is 08/07/11 so nice fresh stock.
Total price was £57.96 inc. VAT and courier delivery.

Thanks to Robin for finding www.brakesint.co.uk

I'll be checking all the relevant measurements and post some pictures over the weekend.

...peter
Peter

Can I ask a couple of questions so that others can consider their options?

Have you fitted standard BMW brake parts in the rest of your system?
Do you know the bore size of your original m/c? - you say it is dual diameter bore size? Are you suggesting the two bores are different sizes?

The reason I ask is you are negating a significant part of the impact of increasing the servo pressure, by opting for the larger bore master cylinder.

Robin has stated his BMW bore size is 20.6mm in his standard set up. I know it does not sound much different, but the pressure in the brake system transmitted by the bore is related to the surface area: the bottom line is the 22.2mm m/c will be 16% harder to press than the 20.6mm. This is significant, given the reason for going to all this trouble is to make the brake pedal easier on the leg muscles.

I chose the 22mm bore m/c as it matches the original Ford Sierra spec to go with my Ford Sierra brake set up. The dual servo gets closer to the original Ford 8" servo, so I should have a system as close to Ford's original spec as possible. By opting for the 22mm bore you are making yours 16% harder to press than in the donor BMW (using Robin's bore figure)


There are, of course, other considerations. The pedal travel on the 22mm bore will be 16% less than the 20.6mm bore and it may be felt that this is worth having - I am in no position to comment as I do not know what it feels like in a BMW based car.

I do not wish to suggest you have got it wrong, but others following this thread need to understand that all our cars are not the same, and that a m/c that works in a Ford set up will not necessarily perform the same in the BMW set up. All other things being the same in the brake set up, my preference would be to opt for a m/c with the same size bore as the donor?

Of course you can suggest Jason has fitted the 22mm bore in his BMW set up and is happy. Given the opportunity to do it again with a 20.6mm bore and 16% less effort, but longer pedal, what would he do next time?

Please take this as a constructive question, for the benefit of others who are still able to choose their set up.
Regards
Mike
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 20th January 2012, 15:59
Mike Mike is offline
Senior Member
Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 932
Mike is on a distinguished road
Default Reservoirs

Several of you have asked about reservoirs fitting the Sierra BMC. The photo below shows the standard Sierra reservoir on the left: on the right are reservoirs from Mk1 Fiestas. These fit the Sierra BMC.

In my Cabrio headroom above the reservoirs is my critical issue. The Sierra reservoir has a maximum depth of 85mm above the BMC - the Fiestas are 90mm.



Will either of these fit in a Sportster?
Would any one like to try the Fiesta option? They both need a home?

Mike
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 20th January 2012, 20:15
peterux's Avatar
peterux peterux is offline
Senior Member
Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,079
peterux is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike View Post
Peter

Can I ask a couple of questions so that others can consider their options?

Have you fitted standard BMW brake parts in the rest of your system?
Do you know the bore size of your original m/c? - you say it is dual diameter bore size? Are you suggesting the two bores are different sizes?

The reason I ask is you are negating a significant part of the impact of increasing the servo pressure, by opting for the larger bore master cylinder.

Robin has stated his BMW bore size is 20.6mm in his standard set up. I know it does not sound much different, but the pressure in the brake system transmitted by the bore is related to the surface area: the bottom line is the 22.2mm m/c will be 16% harder to press than the 20.6mm. This is significant, given the reason for going to all this trouble is to make the brake pedal easier on the leg muscles.

I chose the 22mm bore m/c as it matches the original Ford Sierra spec to go with my Ford Sierra brake set up. The dual servo gets closer to the original Ford 8" servo, so I should have a system as close to Ford's original spec as possible. By opting for the 22mm bore you are making yours 16% harder to press than in the donor BMW (using Robin's bore figure)


There are, of course, other considerations. The pedal travel on the 22mm bore will be 16% less than the 20.6mm bore and it may be felt that this is worth having - I am in no position to comment as I do not know what it feels like in a BMW based car.

I do not wish to suggest you have got it wrong, but others following this thread need to understand that all our cars are not the same, and that a m/c that works in a Ford set up will not necessarily perform the same in the BMW set up. All other things being the same in the brake set up, my preference would be to opt for a m/c with the same size bore as the donor?

Of course you can suggest Jason has fitted the 22mm bore in his BMW set up and is happy. Given the opportunity to do it again with a 20.6mm bore and 16% less effort, but longer pedal, what would he do next time?

Please take this as a constructive question, for the benefit of others who are still able to choose their set up.
Regards
Mike
Hi Mike,

OK, no problem. Let me answer your questions and take you through my decision logic. (But only time will tell if I got it right )

My brakes currently are all standard BMW, but I am a little different to most BMW builders as my donor car was only a 2 litre so was fitted with drum brakes at the rear.
According to realoem there are lots of options fitted to these cars with some fitted with dual bore MC's 22,20/17,46MM.....others were fitted with 20.6mm,
but that's now irrelevant as I fitted a new MC that I bought as NOS from eBay.
Unusually for BMW parts, I can't read any part numbers on it but I can now see that the back section of my current one has a larger external diameter than the front. The front piston drives the real wheel cylinders which are quite small in volume so presumably Dr. BMW decided they needed less fluid than the front disk callipers.(for the same piston travel)
My longer term strategy is to upgrade the back axle brakes to disks (but don't tell my wife ), so I opted for the 22mm bore Sierra MC.
I was close to ordering a Cortina MC with the 20.6 bore but I was concerned that when all four wheels have disk callipers they might need too much pedal travel.

Can you see my logic?
...peter

Last edited by peterux; 20th January 2012 at 20:34.. Reason: grammar!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +0. The time now is 23:47.

copyright © madabout-kitcars.com 2000-2024
terms and conditions | privacy policy